Ls1 Camaro Ss Vs ‘68 Mustang 302
Please help support our BBQ/Car Show this weekend by donating. Every little bit helps and a little something is better than nothing. Please paypal our event coordinator Nam @ namngo910@yahoo.com w…
Car Donations in California
Car Donations in California. Tax Deduction. Help Kids with Cancer.
10 ResponsesComments(10)Trackbacks(0) |
who ever thinks that mustang has a 302 is a fucking ediot that stang is fully built from motor 347 to suspention that camaro has gears and headers lol man thats sad for the little pony
February 7, 2010 8:13 am | #1Thats a mean ass 302, I was my 69 fastback mustang was a street car. Im about to drop in a 410windsor with all the the goodies.
February 7, 2010 8:46 am | #2wow dude… you seriously think a 302 is 7.1 liters?? The 302 WAS NOT MADE to keep up with 440 six-packs (not a hemi motor btw). It was made for a midweight good handling (road racing car). You know NOTHING about cars so don’t make stuff up.
February 7, 2010 9:12 am | #3c5?? anything. you have to learn how to lose
February 7, 2010 9:31 am | #4The t56 was made for the viper. Chevy doesn’t own tremec.
February 7, 2010 9:32 am | #5yep..gotta agree..chevys t56 was a borg-warner transmission..still labeled a t56 tho as far as i know..correct me if im wrong
February 7, 2010 10:03 am | #6good runs
February 7, 2010 10:43 am | #7SICK Mustang and it sounds amazing!!! The Camaro I EVER lost too was a Turbo and Nitrous LS1 and it had me by a car length-
February 7, 2010 11:17 am | #8A boss 302 was a four bolt main 302 cubic inch motor with 351 Cleavland heads on it. It was a 5.0 liter engine.
February 7, 2010 11:58 am | #9haha… wow dude, your an idiot. im not sure how many cubes are in a 7.1 but im sure its not 302, something like 427. 5.0 (302Ci)
February 7, 2010 12:50 pm | #10